Previous Entry | Next Entry

Jan. 5th, 2007

  • 9:47 AM
Stargate Monuments
It's Joe Flanigan's birthday today (see icon) and also the day that marks my realization that after a lifetime of admiring actors who were older than me (Harrison Ford, etc) I'm now admiring one who is younger than me. That's, uh, yeah.


Locus listed the reprint of The Element of Fire under their classic reprints section, which I find really flattering, especially considering the other books listed there. The Amazon link they posted doesn't work, though, and I can't figure out why. I suspect it's something on Amazon's end. (And Lulu (with media mail postage) and Barnes and Noble (with a membership) are cheaper.) It can also be ordered through an independent bookstore with Booksense.


[info]themis asked: One of the things that I really loved about the Ile-Rien books was that they're set in a different time period than most fantasy. Usually, writers fall back upon the middle ages, the pre-Roman Celtic era etc. Was the decision to start Ile-Rien at a later date, so to speak, a conscious one (did you think "I'm really tired of stupid Celtic fantasies, let's try something with corsets and steam engines") or did it just...happen?

Because, as I said, that was one of the things I really loved about your books. Especially Death of the Necromancer, I really felt that the time period figured in prominently. I know "Victorian" fantasy has become a bit more popular (partly, I suppose, to steampunk expansion) but it's still a minority. Personally, I find it a more interesting time period for reading about and creating characters in, if only because the vices are so much more interesting. You can't put cigarettes in a story about Renaissance Italy, after all.


It was very much a conscious decision. When I started The Element of Fire back around 1991 or so, I wasn't finding very much fantasy set in time periods that weren't the middle ages, and I was cherishing every one I did find. (And also books using settings and mythologies from other parts of the world, like the Barry Hughart books set in China, Charles Saunders' book Imaro and his other stories set in Africa, etc, and that's more where City of Bones and Wheel of the Infinite came from.) At the time, I was researching the 17th century in France, reading The Three Musketeers, watching Richard Lester's The Three Musketeers, and so that was my first choice for a time period. I wrote a short story first which was set in Vienne, with Thomas as the main character, decided I really did like this setting, and started the novel.

The Death of the Necromancer was written for much the same reasons. I wanted to read Victorian/La Belle Epoque fantasy, and couldn't find any.


And [info]birdhousefrog had a quick question Seems to me you wrote a tie-in novel recently, but I've lost track of that posting. Was it Stargate or something else?

I have one out now, Stargate Atlantis: Reliquary, and another that should be coming out in the next few months, also SGA, called Entanglement. You can always check the Bibliography page on my web site, which lists everything I have out and what's coming out in the future, including short stories, non-fiction, etc. (And if you hit the main page to this journal, there are links to all my books and other stuff in the sidebar.)


I've got at least one more question to answer, which I'll hit later, and I'm still taking them in this post here. And it doesn't have to be about my books, it can be about writing or publishing in general, though my level of coherency may drop at random.





Comments

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]juliabk wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 06:11 pm (UTC)
It's Joe Flanigan's birthday today (see icon) and also the day that marks my realization that after a lifetime of admiring actors who were older than me (Harrison Ford, etc) I'm now admiring one who is younger than me. That's, uh, yeah.


"Yeah" is right. :-) I'm in the same boat. :-) On the other hand, with the new Indy movie starting filming this year, we get to lust afteradmire Mr. Ford some more. ;-)
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 06:45 pm (UTC)
I'm worse off. I was telling my husband the other day that I thought the USC coach was good looking. I'm now finding men in thier fifteis and sixties attractive.

::cringing:: I don't feel middle aged.
[info]juliabk wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 06:55 pm (UTC)
I've been finding men in that age group attractive since my 20s. My problem is that I'm still finding the men in their 20s and 30s attractive... and I'm, well, not in my 20s or 30s any more. :-)

It's hell working on a university campus where some of the lovely creatures walking by are young enough to be my sons.

[hangs head in shame]

At least I know how to look without, well, looking. ;-) I have *some* dignity left. :-)
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 07:44 pm (UTC)
They have such good skin, don't they....
[info]juliabk wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 08:47 pm (UTC)
Good skin, taut butts, well toned arms and shoulders. Oh, and given their location - BRAINS! *sigh* I love it when the ROTC guys are out running in the mornings. *sigh*
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 08:52 pm (UTC)
Bad girl! Avert your eyes!
[info]juliabk wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 09:06 pm (UTC)
Sunglasses. Greatest thing ever invented.

Now, if we could only get all those lovely young things to stop wearing those stupid pants and get them back to wearing nice form-fitting jeans, life would be grand. ;-)
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 10:07 pm (UTC)
I do hate those pants....
[info]juliabk wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 10:17 pm (UTC)
Someone told me teen pregnancies were finally dropping (now why do I suspect someone messin' with how things are counted) and if so, the only reason I can think of is young men making themselves look so disagreeable that young women give up in disgust.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
Jan. 5th, 2007 11:59 pm (UTC)
::LOL::
( 10 comments — Leave a comment )